Evidence Hub

A Phase 1, Two-Part, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Randomized Study of the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of BMS-986278 (Part A) and a Randomized, Double-blind, Positive-controlled, Placebo-controlled, 4-Period Crossover, Thorough QT/QTc Study to Evaluate the Effect of Multiple Doses of BMS-986278 on Cardiac Repolarization (Part B) in Healthy Participants

ClinicalTrials.gov · COMPLETED, 2025

42 participants

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of high dose of BMS-986278 in healthy participants and to assess the effect of BMS-986278 on the ECG intervals in healthy participants.

Conditions: Healthy Volunteers.

Primary outcome: Number of participants with non-serious Adverse Events (AEs); Number of participants with Serious AEs (SAEs); Number of participants with AEs leading to study intervention discontinuation; Number of participants with vital sign abnormalities; Number of participants with clinical laboratory assessment abnormalities; Number of participants with 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) abnormalities; Number of participants with physical examination abnormalities; Change from baseline Fridericia's corrected QT interval (QTcF) (ΔQTcF); Placebo-corrected change from baseline QTcF (ΔΔQTcF).

Enrollment: 42 participants.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 42 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free