Evidence Hub

A Phase 1, Randomized, Double-Blind Study to Compare the Effect of Omadacycline PO Versus Moxifloxacin PO on the Gut Microbiota in Healthy Adult Volunteers

ClinicalTrials.gov · COMPLETED, 2024

24 participants

Abstract

This is a randomized (1:1), double-blind, double-dummy, phase I study to compare the effects of Omadacycline versus Moxifloxacin on gut microbiota and the resistomes in healthy adult volunteers.The study consists of 3 phases: Screening, double-blind treatment, and follow-up. Healthy volunteers aged 18-40 years, who meet entry criteria, are randomly assigned to a treatment group using an Interactive Voice Response System/Interactive Web Response System (IxRS) and receive the first dose of the study drug.

Conditions: Healthy Volunteer.

Primary outcome: Changes in the types of microbial resistomes.; Changes in the quantity of microbial resistomes.; Changes in the abundance of microbial resistomes..

Enrollment: 24 participants.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 24 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free