Evidence Hub

Deferasirox does not induce QT/QTc-prolongation in healthy subjects

Sechaud R, Dumortier T, Balez S

International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2009

182 participants

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) E14 guidance recommends that almost all drugs should undergo careful clinical testing in a thorough QT/QTc study. Deferasirox (Exjade, ICL670) is a once-daily oral iron chelator, developed for the treatment of blood transfusion-related iron overload.

OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to investigate the effect of deferasirox on the QT/QTc interval.

METHODS: A randomized, single-dose, placebo- and positive-controlled, parallel-group study was conducted in a total of 182 healthy subjects. Study participants were randomized to four treatments arms: deferasirox 20 mg/kg (n = 46), deferasirox 40 mg/kg (n = 46), placebo (n = 46) or moxifloxacin 400 mg (n = 44). Moxifloxacin tablets were taken in an open-label fashion, while the subjects and investigator staff remained blinded for the other treatments. Electrocardiograms, obtained at various time points during a 24-h period, were evaluated centrally in a blinded fashion. The primary endpoint was the average change from baseline in QT/QTc over the 24-h period following intake of study medication. It was prospectively defined that deferasirox will be considered devoid of inducing QT/QTc-prolongation if the upper bound of the 95% 2-sided confidence interval (CI) for the difference to placebo is below 8 milliseconds (i.e., being noninferior to placebo).

RESULTS: Deferasirox 20 and 40 mg/kg were noninferior to placebo with respect to the average change from baseline in…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 182 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free