Evidence Hub

Macular and choroidal thickness after intracameral moxifloxacin for prevention of postcataract endophthalmitis

Ferreira BG, Cardoso da Silva I, Mélega MV, Nascimento MA, Cavalcanti Lira RP, Leite Arieta CE, Alves M

Journal of cataract and refractive surgery, 2021

93 participants

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine any changes in macular or choroidal thickness associated with the use of intracameral moxifloxacin as postcataract endophthalmitis prophylaxis.

SETTING: University of Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.

DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, partially masked, single-site clinical trial.

METHODS: Phacoemulsification surgery patients in the experimental group (Group A) received a 0.03 mL intracameral injection of undiluted moxifloxacin from a sealed bottle immediately after phacoemulsification surgery (150 μg in 0.03 mL-Vigamox solution), whereas the control group (Group B) did not. Investigators evaluated in masked fashion macular and choroidal thickness using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography preoperatively and postoperatively.

RESULTS: A total of 93 patients were included (48 in Group A and 45 in Group B). Baseline parameters were similar between the groups. Either of the 2 parameters assessed differed statistically between the groups or preoperatively vs postoperatively. On postoperative day 30, central macular thickness was 8.85 ± 14.78 μm in Group A and 10.26 ± 22.44 μm in Group B (P = .7232); choroidal thickness as measured by enhanced depth imaging (EDI) was 1.45 ± 16.13 μm in Group A and 3.74 ± 16.15 in Group B (P = .5017). On postoperative day 60, central macular thickness was 19.53 ± 39.28 μm in Group A and 17.14 ± 53.68 μm in Group B (P = .8363); EDI was 5.08 ± 21.96 μm in Group A and 5.24 ± 15.8 in Group B (P = .9752).

CONCLUSIONS:…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 93 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free