Evidence Hub

Bacterial contamination of the vitreous cavity associated with transconjunctival 25-gauge microincision vitrectomy surgery

Tominaga A, Oshima Y, Wakabayashi T, Sakaguchi H, Hori Y, Maeda N

Ophthalmology, 2010

81 participants

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate differences in the bacterial contamination rates of the vitreous cavity between patients undergoing transconjunctival 25-gauge microincision vitrectomy surgery (MIVS) and conventional 20-gauge pars plana vitrectomy (PPV).

DESIGN: Prospective, comparative, consecutive, interventional case series.

PARTICIPANTS: Eighty-one eyes of 81 patients who underwent primary vitrectomy and completed perioperative sample collection.

METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to 25-gauge MIVS or 20-gauge PPV. Conjunctival swabs were obtained from each patient before and after preoperative administration of topical 0.5% moxifloxacin. Vitreous samples were collected at the beginning and end of surgery. All 4 consecutive specimens from each eye were cultured using direct culturing techniques under aerobic and anaerobic conditions.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was the incidence of bacterial contamination of the vitreous cavity at the start and end of vitrectomy. The secondary measures were the incidence of bacterial contamination of the ocular surface and the disinfection rate with preoperative moxifloxacin.

RESULTS: Of the 81 eyes (40 eyes in the 25-gauge MIVS group; 41 eyes in the 20-gauge PPV group), the incidences of positive bacterial isolation at the 4 time points of sample collection were 77.5%, 62.3%, 22.5%, and 0% in the former group and 82.9%, 63.4%, 2.4%, and 0% in the latter group. Although the rate of bacterial contamination of the ocular…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 81 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free