Evidence Hub

Effects of aliskiren, a direct Renin inhibitor, on cardiac repolarization and conduction in healthy subjects

Ayalasomayajula S, Yeh CM, Vaidyanathan S, Flannery B, Dieterich HA, Howard D, Bedigian MP, Dole WP

Journal of clinical pharmacology, 2008

298 participants

Abstract

This multicenter, double-blind study evaluated the effects of aliskiren, a direct renin inhibitor approved for hypertension, on cardiac repolarization and conduction. Healthy volunteers (n = 298) were randomized to aliskiren 300 mg, aliskiren 1200 mg, moxifloxacin 400 mg (positive control), or placebo once daily for 7 days. Digitized electrocardiograms were obtained at baseline and day 7 of treatment over 23 hours postdose. Placebo-adjusted mean changes from baseline in QTcF (Fridericia corrected), QTcI (individualized correction), PR, and QRS intervals were compared at each time point (time-matched analysis) and for values averaged across the dosing period (baseline-averaged analysis). In time-matched analysis, mean changes in QTcF with aliskiren were below predefined limits for QTc prolongation (mean increase 450 milliseconds or a >30-millisecond increase from baseline with aliskiren (< or = 1%) were similar or lower than placebo (< or = 4%). Results were similar for QTcI. Aliskiren had no effect on PR or QRS duration. In conclusion, aliskiren at the highest approved dose (300 mg) and a 4-fold higher dose had no effect on cardiac repolarization or conduction in healthy volunteers.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 298 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free