Evidence Hub

Effects of Cipepofol on Cardiac Depolarization and Repolarization in Healthy Subjects: A Single-Center, Randomized, Placebo and Positive-Controlled Thorough QT Study

Kleiman R, Rudo T, Daley W, Hu M, Yan P, Zhou R, Hou J

Drug design, development and therapy, 2026

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cipepofol (HSK3486), a gamma-aminobutyric acid type A (GABAA) receptor agonist, has garnered considerable attention as a potential alternative to propofol. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of a single intravenous (IV) bolus dose of cipepofol (0.4 mg/kg) on QTc interval in healthy subjects.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a single-center, randomized, blinded (except for moxifloxacin), placebo- and positive-controlled study with a six-sequence, three-period crossover study. Subjects were randomized to 1 of 3 treatment groups in each period: Group A (placebo); Group B (single dose of 0.4 g moxifloxacin, positive control); and Group C (cipepofol [HSK3486], 0.4 mg/kg via IV bolus). The primary endpoint was the change-from-baseline in QTc interval, corrected for heart rate (HR) using the individual QT correction method (QTcI) - ΔQTcI. Secondary endpoints included change-from-baseline in other electrocardiographic (ECG) parameters. Safety/tolerability and pharmacokinetics of cipepofol were also assessed.

RESULTS: Forty-eight subjects were randomized, and demographic characteristics were comparable across the six sequences. The LS mean placebo-corrected ΔQTcI (ΔΔQTcI) interval following cipepofol bolus ranged from -1.7 to 4.1 milliseconds. The upper bound of the two-sided 90% confidence interval for ΔΔQTcI interval remained 480 or an increase in QTcI interval from baseline >60 milliseconds. All adverse events were mild to moderate in severity, and no serious…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free