Evidence Hub

Subconjunctival triamcinolone acetate versus topical steroid for control of inflammation after phacoemulsification surgery - A randomized control trial

Moond H, Sethi NK, Kaur G, Kaur H, Gupta T, Kaur R

Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2026

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the efficacy of subconjunctival triamcinolone versus topical prednisolone in controlling postoperative inflammation after phacoemulsification.

Methods: In this randomized control study, a total of 100 eyes were enrolled. Patients with age-related cataract undergoing phacoemulsification under peribulbar anesthesia were randomly allocated into two groups using a computer-generated random table. Group A received single-dose subconjunctival triamcinolone acetonide (20 mg/0.5 ml) at the end of surgery; Group B received topical prednisolone 1% eyedrops in tapering doses for 1.5 months. Patients were followed up on postoperative days 1, 7, 21, and 42 for anterior chamber (AC) cells, flare, intraocular pressure (IOP), subconjunctival hemorrhage, and cystoid macular edema using optical coherence tomography (OCT). SPSS version 20.0, Chi-square, and t-tests were applied for statistical analysis. A P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: There was no significant difference in AC cells, flare, and mean IOP between both groups on any postoperative day. Three patients had extensive AC inflammation for 5-7 days. Pressure spikes >25 mmHg were noted in four patients in Group A and three patients in Group B ( P value = 0.69). Subconjunctival hemorrhage was significantly more in Group A (P 0.001) on days 1 and 7, which resolved in all patients by 21 days. There was no significant difference in central subfoveal thickness on OCT in both groups on day…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free