Evidence Hub

Efficacy and safety of prophylactic simultaneous intravitreal moxifloxacin injection with standard intravitreal anti-VEGF injection procedure in cases of cystoid macular edema and macular neovascularization

Elmohamady MN, Bayoumy ASM, Khater AAE, Faramawi HM

BMC ophthalmology, 2025

Abstract

Background: To investigate the safety and efficacy of prophylactic use of commercially available intravitreal moxifloxacin 0.5% (Vigamox) at the time of intravitreal anti-VEGF injection against post-injection infectious endophthalmitis.

Patients and methods: A prospective interventional randomized controlled trial including eyes with cystoid macular edema or macular neovascularization planned to receive intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy. Eyes were randomly assigned to either day A or day B for intravitreal injection procedure; eyes in day A received simultaneous intravitreal anti-VEGF and moxifloxacin (study group), while eyes in day B received intravitreal anti-VEGF only (control group). The presence of postoperative toxic reactions and endophthalmitis rates was assessed together with change in BCVA & retinal in both groups.

Results: A total of 1352 intravitreal injection procedures were done in study group and 1487 in control group. Endophthalmitis was rare across both groups, 0 case in the study group and two cases (0.2%) in the control group which was statistically insignificant (P = 0.502). Reduction in CME was comparable in both groups, (MD = -228.17 μm) in the study group, (MD = -221.28 μm) in the control group (P = 0.044). Similar Improvement of BCVA in both groups with a difference of -0.56 in the study group and - 0.54 in the control group (P = 0.151). No toxic AC reactions or retinal toxicity was observed in the study group confirmed by similar postoperative…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free