Evidence Hub

A Randomized Thorough QT Trial Using Concentration-QT Analysis to Evaluate the Effects of Centanafadine on Cardiac Repolarization

Turkoglu OS, Wang X, Repella-Gordon J, Shoaf SE

Clinical pharmacology in drug development, 2025

30 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Centanafadine is a norepinephrine/dopamine/serotonin reuptake inhibitor in development for treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. This double-blind, placebo- and moxifloxacin-controlled, 3-period crossover trial evaluated the effects of centanafadine (EB-1020) and its metabolite (EB-10601) on cardiac repolarization in 30 healthy adults (18-65 years). Dosing sequences included centanafadine sustained-release 800 mg (supratherapeutic) total daily dose, placebo, and moxifloxacin 400 mg. Electrocardiogram parameters and heart rate (HR) were assessed. The primary endpoint was placebo-corrected change from baseline QTc (ΔΔQTc), analyzed using concentration-QTc (C-QTc) analysis. The C-QTc slopes for centanafadine (-0.001 ms/[ng/mL]) and EB-10601 (-0.0003 ms/[ng/mL]) were not statistically significant. Assay sensitivity was confirmed by the statistically significant C-QTc slope for moxifloxacin (0.004 ms/[ng/mL]) and a 2-sided 90% confidence interval lower bound >5 milliseconds. No change from baseline in QTcF or placebo-corrected QTcF ≥10 milliseconds for centanafadine was observed at any postdose time point. No centanafadine-treated participants had QTcF increases of >30 milliseconds and no relevant PR/QRS interval or HR increases were observed. The predicted ΔΔQTcF values of centanafadine, EB-10601, and moxifloxacin at the geometric mean Cmax were -2.72, -1.59, and 11.75 milliseconds, respectively. No serious treatment-emergent adverse events or deaths were…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 30 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free