Evidence Hub

Comparison of clinical and patient-reported outcomes of contralateral topography-guided vs wavefront-guided LASIK

Dudenhoefer NE, Rodgers SB, Evangelista CB, Legault GL, Chen SS, Kohler PD, Capó-Aponte JE

Journal of cataract and refractive surgery, 2026

66 participants

Abstract

Purpose: To compare 6-month visual and patient-reported outcomes between topography-guided (TG) using Contoura with Phorcides and wavefront-guided (WFG) LASIK using iDesign 2.0 laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK).

Setting: Joint Warfighter Refractive Surgery Center, Lackland Air Force Base, Texas.

Design: Prospective, double-blind, randomized.

Methods: 66 participants receive TG-LASIK in one eye and WFG-LASIK in the contralateral eye. Preoperative and postoperative assessments included uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), manifest refraction, higher-order aberrations (HOAs), Schirmer test, and validated questionnaires (Patient-Reported Outcomes with LASIK-Symptoms and Satisfaction; Standard Patient Evaluation of Eye Dryness). Flaps were created with the Zeiss VisuMax femtosecond laser, followed by TG or WFG excimer laser ablation. Outcomes were evaluated at multiple timepoints through 6 months.

Results: At 6 months, 54% of WFG-LASIK eyes and 46% of TG-LASIK eyes achieved UDVA of 20/16 or better ( P = .48). TG-LASIK showed a higher efficiency index (1.08 vs 1.02; P = .03) and better mean spherical equivalent (0.04 diopters [D] vs 0.13 D; P = .04), while WFG-LASIK had superior low-contrast UDVA and CDVA. Safety indices, residual HOAs, and dry eye symptoms were similar between groups. Both procedures significantly improved patient satisfaction and reduced visual disturbances compared with baseline.

Conclusions: Both…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 66 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free