Evidence Hub

Safety of intracameral injection of moxifloxacin using total replacement technique (bag and chamber flushing)

Matsuura K, Suto C, Inoue Y, Sasaki S, Odawara S, Gotou T

Journal of ocular pharmacology and therapeutics : the official journal of the Association for Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2014

36 participants

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the safety of intracameral injection of moxifloxacin (MFLX) using the total replacement technique [bag and chamber (BC) flushing].

METHODS: The anterior chamber including the area behind the intraocular lens was irrigated and replaced using BC flushing. In Group A, 36 patients received balanced salt solution irrigation in the right eye and intracameral MFLX (150 μg/mL: 33-fold dilution of 0.5% eye drops) in the left eye. In Group B, 33 patients received intracameral MFLX in the right (500 μg/mL: 10-fold dilution) and left eyes (150 μg/mL: 33-fold dilution). Visual acuity, intraocular pressure, corneal endothelial cell density, corneal thickness, and foveal thickness were recorded before and up to 3 months after surgery.

RESULTS: In either group, there were no statistically significant differences between the right and left eyes with respect to visual acuity, intraocular pressure, corneal endothelial cell count, and foveal thickness before and at 3 months after surgery. There was no difference in corneal thickness before and at 3 months after surgery. In patients who received 500 μg/mL MFLX during surgery, central corneal thickness at 1 week after surgery was significantly reduced.

CONCLUSIONS: In the present study, there was no adverse effect associated with intracameral injection of 150-500 μg/mL MFLX. Moreover, our results supported the safety of BC flushing. Thus, BC flushing, which can irrigate the inside of the capsular bag and attain stable…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 36 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free