Evidence Hub

Ipragliflozin does not prolong QTc interval in healthy male and female subjects: a phase I study

Zhang W, Smulders R, Abeyratne A, Dietz A, Krauwinkel W, Kadokura T, Keirns J

Clinical therapeutics, 2013

88 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ipragliflozin, a potent, selective sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor, is in development for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. The International Conference on Harmonisation recommends that the safety investigation of new drugs include characterization of each agent's effects on the QT/QTc interval.

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to assess the effect on cardiac repolarization (QTc interval) of repeated oral dosing of ipragliflozin at therapeutic (100 mg/d) and supratherapeutic (600 mg/d) levels in healthy subjects.

METHODS: This was a double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled, 4-way crossover study. Subjects were randomized to 1 of 4 treatment sequences each including the following 4 treatments: placebo for 7 days; ipragliflozin 100 mg/d for 7 days; ipragliflozin 600 mg/d for 7 days; and active control moxifloxacin 400 mg on day 7 only. The primary assessment of QTc was based on Fridericia's correction for heart rate (QTcF). Continuous 12-lead ECG interval extraction assessments were conducted on day 7. The least squares mean treatment difference from placebo and corresponding 2-sided 90% CIs were calculated for QTcF up to 14 hours postdose on treatment day 7. Ipragliflozin was deemed unlikely to have a clinically relevant effect on QTcF if the upper bound of the maximum treatment difference from placebo for ipragliflozin across all time points was 5 ms.

RESULTS: A total of 88 subjects were randomized to treatment (n = 22 per sequence; 10…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 88 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free