Evidence Hub

Vitreous penetration of topical moxifloxacin and gatifloxacin in humans

Costello P, Bakri SJ, Beer PM, Singh RJ, Falk NS, Peters GB, Melendez JA

Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2006

12 participants

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the vitreous penetration of the new fourth-generation topical fluoroquinolones moxifloxacin 0.5% and gatifloxacin 0.3%.

METHODS: A prospective randomized clinical trial comprising 12 eyes of 12 patients scheduled for pars plana vitrectomy between August 2003 and September 2003 was performed in a clinical practice. The patients were randomly assigned to receive topical moxifloxacin 0.5% (n = 6) or gatifloxacin 0.3% (n = 6). One half the patients in each antibiotic group received 1 drop every 15 minutes for a total of 3 doses starting 1 hour before surgery, and the other one half self-administered the antibiotic drop 4 times daily for 3 days before surgery and at 7 am on the day of surgery. Undiluted vitreous samples were obtained and analyzed using high-performance liquid chromatography.

RESULTS: Either moxifloxacin 0.5% or gatifloxacin 0.3% was detected in the vitreous in all 12 patients in the study. There was no significant difference between the mean vitreous concentration of moxifloxacin 0.5% given over 1 hour preoperatively (0.012 +/- 0.011 microg/mL) and that given in the 3-day regimen (0.011 +/- 0.008 microg/mL) (P = 0.93). There was also no significant difference between the mean vitreous concentration of gatifloxacin 0.3% given over 1 hour preoperatively (0.001 +/- 0.0003 microg/mL) and that given over 3 days (0.008 +/- 0.006 microg/mL) (P = 0.11). Vitreous concentrations of moxifloxacin 0.5% and gatifloxacin 0.3% in each eye were all lower…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 12 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free