Evidence Hub

RIMOXCLAMIN's Therapeutic Impact in a Larger Brazilian Hansen's Disease Population

Frade MAC, Albertino GS, de Paula NA, Cinto FAC, Perecin FC, Westin A, Monteiro MM, Marques Junior W et al.

Open forum infectious diseases, 2026

Abstract

BACKGROUND: RIMOXCLAMIN, a new antibiotic regimen for Hansen's disease (HD), combines rifampicin, moxifloxacin, clarithromycin, and minocycline; the WHO-MDT combines rifampicin, dapsone, and clofazimine. To overcome limitations of WHO-MDT, we evaluated both regimens in a 2-arm cohort of multibacillary patients.

METHODS: Two-arm observational cohort included 162 newly diagnosed multibacillary cases (103 RIMOXCLAMIN and 59 WHO-MDT) evaluated between 2015 and 2025. Patients were assessed at least quarterly (baseline and months 3, 6, and 12) for neurological and cutaneous findings, adverse events, tactile sensitivity, and physical disability grade (PDG).

RESULTS: Neurological symptoms were frequent regardless of lesion count (≤5 vs > 5; P > .05). RIMOXCLAMIN demonstrated a greater reduction in nerve thickening than WHO-MDT (P < .0001) and increased PDG-0 from 18% to 82% (P < .0001), compared with 22%-53% in the WHO-MDT group (P = .0006). RIMOXCLAMIN reduced PDG-2 by 67% at month 6 (P = .002) and 83% at discharge (P < .0001), whereas WHO-MDT showed no change at month 6 and a 50% reduction at discharge. At month 3, neurological symptoms were greater in the RIMOXCLAMIN group than in the WHO-MDT, with no intragroup differences. WHO-MDT showed higher adverse events, including severe anemia (requiring dapsone discontinuation in 33.9% [20/59]). RIMOXCLAMIN adverse events were mild, requiring regimen adjustments in 19.4% (20/103) without additional medications. A general limitation is…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free