Evidence Hub

An open-label, single-arm, dose-escalating concentration-QT study to investigate the cardiac effects and safety of paroxetine in healthy adults

van Dijkman SC, Félices M, Pandurangavittal B, Ghorpade S, Easterbrook C, Zabielski M, Della Pasqua O

British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2026

38 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

Aims: Paroxetine is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), approved for treatment of major depressive disorder and anxiety disorders. Some SSRIs are known to prolong the QT interval; however, clinical evidence to establish a lack of association between paroxetine and corrected QT interval (QTc) prolongation is limited. Therefore, this study aimed to characterize the relationship between paroxetine concentration and QT/QTc interval following therapeutic doses in healthy individuals.

Methods: This open-label, single-arm, dose-escalating concentration-QT study (NCT06065735) was performed in healthy adults (18-65 years) without a history of cardiac disease or pre-diagnosed mood disorder. Eligible individuals (n = 38) received paroxetine 20 to 60 mg QD for 1 week per dose level. Paroxetine plasma concentrations and electrocardiogram recordings were monitored over a 12 h period on Days 1 (baseline), 7 (20 mg), 14 (40 mg) and 21 (60 mg).

Results: Mean change from baseline in QTcF (ΔQTcF) fluctuated between -7.1 and +4.7 ms. However, diurnal variation was also observed without treatment. A linear regression model showed no clinically significant effect of paroxetine concentrations on ΔQTcF, with a weak slope of 0.0108 ms/ng/mL (90% CI: 0.01, 0.03) and maximum ΔQTcF of +0.42 ms (90% CI: -2.68, 3.52) at 60 mg QD, corresponding to a Cmax of 221.4 (95%CI: 179.6-272.8) ng/mL. Similarly, paroxetine did not affect the mean change in PR or QRS interval, or heart rate relative to…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 38 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free