Evidence Hub

Vericiguat: A Randomized, Phase Ib, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, QTc Interval Study in Patients with Chronic Coronary Syndromes

Böttcher M, Düngen HD, Corcea V, Donath F, Fuhr R, Gal P, Mikus G, Trenk D et al.

American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions, 2023

74 participants · 13 citations

Abstract

Background: Vericiguat is indicated for the treatment of symptomatic chronic heart failure in adult patients with reduced ejection fraction who are stabilized after a recent decompensation event.

Objective: To investigate the effects of vericiguat on QT interval in patients with chronic coronary syndromes (CCS).

Methods: This was a randomized, phase Ib, placebo-controlled, double-blind, double-dummy, multicenter study. Vericiguat once daily was up-titrated from 2.5 mg to 5 mg and then to 10 mg (treatments A, B, and C) at 14-day intervals. Positive control was moxifloxacin 400 mg (single dose on day 8 or day 50; placebo on other days [treatment D]). We evaluated the placebo-adjusted change from baseline of the Frederica-corrected QTc interval (QTcF), pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of vericiguat.

Results: In total, 74 patients with CCS, with mean (standard deviation) age 63.4 (8.0) years, were included and 72 patients completed the study. At each timepoint up to 7 h after administration, mean placebo-corrected change in QTcF from baseline was < 6 ms and the upper limit of the two-sided 90% confidence interval of the mean was below the 10-ms threshold for clinical relevance. Moxifloxacin confirmed the assay sensitivity. Median time of maximum concentration of vericiguat was 4.5 h post-dose. The adverse event profile of vericiguat was consistent with its mechanism of action, and the findings did not indicate any safety concerns.

Conclusions: As part of an integrative…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 74 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free