Evidence Hub

Cultivated autologous limbal epithelial cell (CALEC) transplantation for limbal tem cell deficiency: a phase I/II clinical trial of the first xenobiotic-free, serum-free, antibiotic-free manufacturing protocol developed in the US

Jurkunas UV, Kaufman AR, Yin J, Ayala A, Maguire M, Samarakoon L, Johns LK, Parekh M et al.

Nature communications, 2025

15 participants · 17 citations

Abstract

We developed a two-stage manufacturing process utilizing cultivated autologous limbal epithelial cells (CALEC), the first xenobiotic-free, serum-free, antibiotic-free protocol developed in the United States, to treat blindness caused by unilateral limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD) and conducted a single-center, single-arm, phase I/II clinical trial. Primary outcomes were feasibility (meeting release criteria) and safety (ocular infection, corneal perforation, or graft detachment). Participant eligibility included male or female participants age 18 to <90 years old and ability to provide written informed consent with LSCD. Funding was provided by the National Eye Institute of the National Institutes of Health. CALEC grafts met release criteria in 14 (93%) of 15 participants at conclusion of trial. After first stage manufacturing, intracellular adenosine triphosphate levels correlated with colony forming efficiency (r = 0.65, 95% CI [0.04, 0.89]). One bacterial infection occurred unrelated to treatment, with no other primary safety events. The secondary outcome was to investigate efficacy based on improvement in corneal epithelial surface integrity (complete success) or improvement in corneal vascularization and/or participant symptomatology as measured by OSDI and SANDI (partial success). 86%, 93%, and 92% of grafts resulted in complete or partial success at 3, 12, and 18 months, respectively. Our results provide strong support that CALEC transplantation is safe and feasible…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 15 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free