Evidence Hub

Pharmacokinetics of Omadacycline in Adults with Cystic Fibrosis

Sanders M, Hong E, Chung PS, Rao AP, Beringer P

Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2024

300 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Background: Omadacycline offers a potential advancement in the management of infections in people with cystic fibrosis (CF) because of its spectrum of activity, intrapulmonary penetration, and oral bioavailability. A prospective single-dose, single-arm study was conducted to characterize the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of omadacycline in people with CF, considering the known alterations in PK observed in this population (NCT04460586, 2020-07-01).

Methods: Plasma samples were obtained from nine adults with CF who received a single dose of intravenous omadacycline 100 mg over 0.5 h followed by a 1-week washout and an oral dose of omadacycline 300 mg. The data were analyzed using noncompartmental PK.

Results: The maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the curve extrapolated to infinity (AUC0-∞) after intravenous administration of omadacycline were similar between healthy volunteers and people with CF. The absorption kinetics of oral omadacycline, encompassing both the rate (Cmax and time to Cmax [tmax]) and the extent (AUC0-∞), also showed consistency between healthy volunteers and people with CF. The absolute bioavailability of the oral tablet formulation of omadacycline in people with CF (31.2%) was also consistent with that observed in healthy volunteers (34.5%). In comparing the two routes of administration, intravenous omadacycline 100 mg provided plasma exposures equivalent to those with oral omadacycline 300 mg in people with CF, as evidenced by geometric…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 300 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free