Evidence Hub

Efficacy and tolerability of moxifloxacin in the treatment of acute bacterial sinusitis caused by penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae: a pooled analysis

Johnson P, Cihon C, Herrington J, Choudhri S

Clinical therapeutics, 2004

806 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae (PRSP) has become a relatively common pathogen in upper and lower respiratory tract infections, including acute bacterial sinusitis (ABS).

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this analysis was to assess the efficacy and tolerability of moxifloxacin in the treatment of ABS caused by penicillin-sensitive S pneumoniae (PSSP) and PRSP METHODS: Two prospective, multicenter, open-label, noncomparative US trials of moxifloxacin were included in this pooled analysis. All patients received oral moxifloxacin 400 mg once daily for 7 to 10 days. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of moxifloxacin and penicillin were determined using the E-test and standard broth-microdilution methods. The primary end point was clinical success at the test-of-cure visit (21-37 days after completion of therapy) in patients with a positive pretherapy sinus culture. Data are presented for patients with ABS caused by both PSSP and PRSP RESULTS: Of 806 patients enrolled in the 2 studies, 146 had microbiologically confirmed bacterial infection. Sixty-nine patients had ABS caused by S pneumoniae, including 15 confirmed cases of PRSP infection. The majority of the 69 clinically evaluable patients were white (n = 63) and female (n = 46), and the mean age of this population was 43 years. Investigators categorized the episode of ABS as severe in 26 (37.7%) of clinically evaluable patients and of moderate severity in the remainder (62.3% [43]); however, most patients…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 806 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free