Evidence Hub

Clinical efficacy and correlation of clinical outcomes with in vitro susceptibility for anaerobic bacteria in patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections treated with moxifloxacin

Goldstein EJ, Solomkin JS, Citron DM, Alder JD

Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2011

1,209 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Appropriate antimicrobial therapy results in improved clinical outcomes in complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAIs). Recent in vitro studies have reported increasing moxifloxacin resistance of Bacteroides species, thereby cautioning empiric use in infections with these organisms.

METHODS: This pooled analysis of 4 randomized clinical trials (2000-2010) evaluated the comparative efficacy of moxifloxacin in cIAIs, including infection with anaerobic organisms. The intent-to-treat population included 1209 patients who received moxifloxacin (745 microbiologically valid cases) and 1193 patients who received comparator agents (741 microbiologically valid cases).

RESULTS: Overall clinical success rates in the per-protocol population were 85.6% (817 of 955 patients) for moxifloxacin and 87.8% (860 of 979 patients) for comparators. Of 642 pretherapy anaerobes from moxifloxacin-treated patients, 561 (87.4%) were susceptible at ≤2 mg/L, 34 (5.3%) were intermediate at 4 mg/L, and 47 (7.3%) were resistant at ≥8 mg/L. Moxifloxacin achieved similar clinical success rates against all anaerobes including those isolated from patients infected with Bacteroides fragilis (158 [82.7%] of 191 patients), Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron (74 [82.2%] of 90 patients) and Clostridium species (37 [80.4%] of 46 patients). The overall clinical success rate for all anaerobes was 82.3%. For all anaerobes combined, the clinical success rate was 83.1% (466 of 561 patients) for a minimum…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 1,209 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free