Evidence Hub

Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis Outcomes in South Kivu Province, Democratic Republic of Congo, During a Humanitarian Crisis (2018-2024)

Musafiri EM, Kabesha BT, Birembano F, Nyota R, Mapendo MC, Chirambiza JP, Mosomo TK, Namegabe EN

Open forum infectious diseases, 2026

Abstract

Background: Drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB) management in fragile, conflict-affected settings remains challenging. South Kivu Province has faced protracted insecurity and recent outbreaks (COVID-19, mpox). We assessed treatment outcomes and predictors among DR-TB patients managed under programmatic conditions.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective provincial cohort study of all patients registered in electronic Tuberculosis registry with DR-TB in South Kivu from January 2018 to June 2024. Primary outcome was treatment success; unsuccessful outcomes. We summarized characteristics, performed Kaplan-Meier functions for time to outcome, and fitted multivariable logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models to identify predictors of unsuccessful outcomes.

Results: Among 277 DR-TB patients (median age 37 years; 3-75), overall treatment success was 77.6%, mortality 13.4%, and loss to follow-up (LTFU) 8.6%. HIV status was negative in 79.1% and positive in 9.4%. Bedaquiline-containing regimens were used in 100%. In adjusted analyses, rural residence was protective against unsuccessful outcome (aOR 0.42; 95% CI 0.21-0.82; P = .011), whereas retreatment other than relapse was associated with higher odds of unsuccessful outcome (aOR 2.04; 95% CI 1.09-3.81; P = .026). Findings were consistent in time-to-event models (rural aHR 0.50; 95% CI 0.29-0.85; P = .011; retreatment aHR 1.71; 95% CI 1.03-2.83; P = .038).

Conclusions: In a humanitarian crisis context, programmatic…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free