Evidence Hub

The Steroids for Corneal Ulcers Trial (SCUT): secondary 12-month clinical outcomes of a randomized controlled trial

M. Srinivasan, Jeena Mascarenhas, R. Rajaraman, M. Ravindran, P. Lalitha, Kieran S. O'Brien, D. Glidden, Kathryn J. Ray et al.

American journal of ophthalmology-glaucoma, 2013

500 participants · 105 citations

Abstract

Purpose To determine whether topical corticosteroids as adjunctive therapy for bacterial keratitis improves long-term clinical outcomes. Design Randomized placebo-controlled double-masked clinical trial. Methods This multicenter trial compared 1.0% prednisolone sodium phosphate to placebo in the treatment of bacterial keratitis among 500 patients with culture-positive ulcers receiving 48 hours of moxifloxacin before randomization. The primary endpoint was 3 months from enrollment, and 399 patients were evaluated at 12 months. The outcomes examined were best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) and scar size at 12 months. Based on previous results, regression models with adjustments for baseline status and/or causative organism were used for analysis. Results No significant differences in clinical outcomes by treatment group were seen with the pre-specified regression models (BSCVA: −0.04 logMAR, 95%CI, −0.12 to 0.05, P=0.39; scar size: 0.03mm, 95% CI, −0.12 to 0.18, P=0.69). A regression model including a Nocardia-treatment arm interaction found corticosteroid use associated with a mean one-line improvement in BSCVA at 12 months among patients with non-Nocardia ulcers (−0.10 logMAR, 95%CI, −0.19 to −0.02, P=0.02). No significant difference was observed in 12-month BSCVA for Nocardia ulcers (0.18 logMAR, 95% CI, −0.04 to 0.41, P=0.16). Corticosteroids were associated with larger mean scar size at 12 months among Nocardia ulcers (0.47mm, 95% CI, 0.06 to 0.88, P=0.02) and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 500 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free