Evidence Hub

PID5: moxifloxacin vs amoxicillin/clavulanate in the treatment of acute maxillary sinusitis (AMS): efficacy, safety and patient-reported outcomes in primary care

S. Rakkar

2001

475 participants

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to reflect real-world experience in the treatment of patients with AMS. Efficacy, safety, and patient-reported outcomes variables were compared between moxifloxacin (MXF) and amoxicillin/clavulanate (AC) for the management of AMS in a primary care setting. METHODS: In this prospective, multicenter, non-blinded phase IIIb trial, 475 adult patients with symptoms of AMS were randomized to receive a 10-day oral regimen of either MXF (400mg once-daily) or AC (875mg twice-daily). Clinical success at the test-of-cure (TOC) visit (post-therapy days 14–21) was the primary efficacy measure. Secondary outcomes included rate of clinical relapse at follow-up (post-therapy days 26–46) and exploratory evaluation of patient-reported outcomes variables. Safety data was also tabulated from intent-to-treat (ITT) patients. RESULTS: Of 471 adults comprising the ITT population (234 MXF, 237 AC), MXF treatment was statistically equivalent to AC at the TOC visit (85.2% vs 81.8%; 95%CI = −6%,13%). Per-protocol analysis also confirmed statistical equivalence between MXF and AC (86.5% vs 83.6%; 95%CI = −7%,13%). Rates of relapse were similar for the ITT (4% MXF, 5% AC) and the per-protocol (4% both) populations. The frequency of drug-related adverse events were similar between MXF (30%) and AC (25%) and were primarily gastrointestinal-related: nausea (11% MXF, 5% AC) and diarrhea (3% MXF, 10% AC). At the TOC visit, significantly more MXF-treated patients (n = 47;…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 475 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free