Evidence Hub

A Thorough QT Study Using C-QTc to Evaluate the Effects of Centanafadine on Cardiac Repolarization

Sultana Jahan, Zach Lease, Jordan Richardson, Ashley L. Brown, E. D. Neill

CNS Spectrums, 2024

30 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Introduction Centanafadine (CTN) is a potential first-in-class norepinephrine/dopamine/serotonin triple reuptake inhibitor (NDSRI) in development for treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The effect of CTN on cardiac repolarization from a thorough QT (TQT) trial is reported. Methods In this double-blind, placebo (PBO)- and active-controlled, 3-period crossover TQT trial, healthy adults (18-65 years) were randomized to dosing sequences including CTN (800 mg supratherapeutic dose: 4 x 100 mg tablets in the morning and 5 hours later), CTN PBO (4 PBO tablets in the morning and 5 hours later), and active control moxifloxacin (400 mg + CTN PBO in the morning and CTN PBO 5 hours later). Morning doses were separated by 72 hours. Plasma was collected and data were extracted from continuously recorded ECGs for 24 hours following dosing. Effects on ECG parameters (QT interval with Fridericia correction factor [QTcF], PR and QRS intervals, and T- and U-wave morphology), and heart rate (HR) were assessed. The primary analysis was C-QTc, the relationship between drug concentration and PBO-corrected change from baseline in QTcF (ΔΔQTcF). Categorical analyses of ECG parameters were conducted for changes in QTcF, PR, and QRS intervals and in HR. Results Of 30 participants enrolled, 56.7% were male and 86.7% were White. Mean (SD) age was 37.6 (14.5) years; mean (SD) BMI was 26.4 (3.4) kg/m2. The slope (90% CI) of the C-QTc relationship for CTN was −0.001 (−0.003,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 30 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free