Evidence Hub

Recurrent Choroidal Neovascular Membrane as the Initial Presentation of Mycobacterium chimaera-Associated Serpiginoid Choroiditis

Babu K, Padmapriya PG, Gowda SMN, Murthy PR

Ocular immunology and inflammation, 2025

Abstract

PURPOSE: To report a rare presentation of a proven case of Mycobacterium chimaera infection presenting as multifocal choroiditis with recurrent choroidal neovascular membrane (CNVM) in one eye, initially misdiagnosed as punctate inner choroidopathy and later developed serpiginous-like choroiditis in the other eye.

METHODS: Retrospective case report with a review of existing literature.

RESULTS: A 30-year-old women presented with metamorphopsia (OD) and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 6/24 (OD) and was diagnosed to have punctate inner choroidopathy with CNVM (OD). Since then, she had received four intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections over 3 years. Two years later, she developed a slowly progressing choroidal lesion radiating from the disc in a serpiginoid manner in the left eye. There was no vitritis. Labs revealed a positive QuantiFERON-TB Gold test. High-resolution computed tomography of the thorax showed sub-centimetre noncalcified lymph nodes in subcarinal and perivascular regions, minimal pleural thickening in left lower zone, minimal pericardial effusion, bronchiectatic changes, and fibrotic strands in right middle and left lower lobes. Bronchoalveolar lavage grew M. chimaera intracellularae (matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry). She was given a course of clarithromycin, moxifloxacin, rifampicin, and doxycycline for 12 months. Though the right eye remained stable, choroidal lesion in the left eye…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free