Evidence Hub

A multicenter retrospective electronic health record database evaluation of subjects with Mycoplasma genitalium

Green E, Dum R, Shook J, Krawiec C

Journal of the American Pharmacists Association : JAPhA, 2024

1,126 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mycoplasma genitalium is a sexually transmitted infection (STI) increasing in prevalence. The recent availability of nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) has led to updated diagnostic and treatment guidelines. As medication therapy experts, pharmacists can facilitate appropriate antimicrobial selection and stewardship and optimize best patient-care practices in the setting of M. genitalium infection.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate patient demographics, therapeutic approaches, and complications of patients with laboratory evidence of M. genitalium hypothesizing that younger adolescent females are affected by this organism, receive suboptimal treatment, and have more complications than adults.

METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study using TriNetX multicenter electronic health record data of subjects aged 12 years and older with evidence of M. genitalium DNA detected via NAATs. The cohort was divided into 2 age groups: adolescents (12-21 years) and adults (older than 21 years). We evaluated age, sex, race, ethnicity, diagnostic codes, and medication codes.

RESULTS: Our study included 1126 subjects (192 adolescents [17.1%] and 934 adults [82.9%]) who tested positive for M. genitalium. Subjects in the adolescent group had higher odds of being women (2.52 [1.80, 3.54], P < 0.001), having inflammatory diseases of female pelvic organs diagnostic codes (1.51 [1.06, 2.16], P = 0.025), increased odds of azithromycin prescription (1.70 [1.17, 2.48], P =…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 1,126 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free