Evidence Hub

Antimicrobial resistance in the Bacteroides fragilis group: National multicenter survey and Bayesian modelling study, France, 2022-2023

Delvallez G, Campagne P, Alauzet C, Diancourt L, Barbut F, Marchandin H, Dupuy B, BFG AMR Collaborative Study group

Journal of global antimicrobial resistance, 2026

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Epidemiological studies on Bacteroides fragilis group (BFG) species and their antimicrobial resistance (AMR) profiles remain scarce worldwide and are lacking in France. The aim of this study was to provide comprehensive national data on the distribution of BFG species, isolation sites, AMR and its potential regional disparity.

METHODS: A retrospective multicenter study was conducted from January 2022 to December 2023 using routine data from 45 French hospitals. A total of 9458 BFG isolates identified to the species level by MALDI-ToF were included. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) was performed according to French guidelines using either disc diffusion or gradient diffusion methods. AST results were collected for ten antibiotics: amoxicillin-clavulanate (AMC), piperacillin-tazobactam (PIT), imipenem (IMI), clindamycin (CLI), metronidazole (MET), moxifloxacin, tigecycline, linezolid, rifampicin, and chloramphenicol. A Bayesian statistical model was applied to estimate regional resistance frequencies with corresponding credible intervals.

RESULTS: Bacteroides fragilis sensu stricto (B. fragilis) was the most prevalent species (62.4%), followed by Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron (14.2%). Resistance to IMI and MET remained low, while AMC, PIT, and CLI resistance varied markedly across species: 5.2%, 3.6%, and 34.4% for B. fragilis; 18.0%, 50.1%, and 72.9% for B. thetaiotaomicron; and 32.1%, 19.5%, and 75.2% for Parabacteroides distasonis, respectively.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free