Evidence Hub

Infection model of THP-1 cells, growth dynamics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of clinical Mycobacterium abscessus isolates from cystic fibrosis patients: Results from a multicentre study

Ruedas-López A, Tato M, Lerma L, Esteban J, Muñoz-Egea MC, Toro C, Domingo D, Prados-Rosales R et al.

PloS one, 2025

148 participants

Abstract

Mycobacterium abscessus (MABS) is an emerging pathogen causing severe infections, particularly in cystic fibrosis (CF) patients. A prospective multicentre study included CF patients from four hospitals in Madrid between January 2022 and January 2024. Respiratory samples were collected, and MABS isolates were analysed to determine their antibiotic resistance profiles, growth dynamics, infection kinetics, intracellular behaviour, and pathogenicity. Intracellular bacterial growth and macrophage viability were evaluated through THP-1 cell infection experiments, with and without amikacin. Phenotypic susceptibility testing and genotypic susceptibility testing were also conducted. Among 148 patients, 28 MABS isolates were detected from 16 patients (10.8%), and the first isolate from each patient was analysed. Isolation was more prevalent in younger individuals (median age 24.4 vs. 28.4 years, p = 0.049), and most isolates (81.25%) were identified as M. abscessus subsp. abscessus (MABSa). MABS isolates exhibited high resistance rates (>85%) to doxycycline, tobramycin, ciprofloxacin, moxifloxacin (75%) and cotrimoxazole (56.3%). Amikacin resistance (18.8%) was higher than expected, and inducible (10/16 isolates) or acquired (1/16 isolate) macrolide resistance was found in 68.8% of strains. Phenotypic and genotypic testing results were fully concordant. Tigecycline demonstrated strong in vitro activity, and resistance to imipenem, linezolid, and cefoxitin remained low. Rough strains…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 148 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free