Evidence Hub

Clinical Outcomes and Genomic Epidemiology of Multidrug-Resistant Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Keratitis

Cummings OW, Andre C, Ling J, Yeung SN, Faggioni A, Iovieno A, Bispo PJM

American journal of ophthalmology, 2026

67 participants

Abstract

PURPOSE: To characterize the clinical features, management, antimicrobial resistance patterns, and genomic epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) keratitis at two North American centers.

DESIGN: Retrospective interventional case series combined with laboratory investigation PARTICIPANTS: Seventy eyes of 67 patients presenting laboratory-confirmed MRSA keratitis were included METHODS: We performed a multicenter retrospective case series of patients with culture-proven MRSA keratitis treated between 2005 and 2022. Demographic and clinical data were collected. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was conducted, and multidrug resistance (MDR) was defined as resistance to ≥3 antibiotic classes. A subset of isolates underwent whole-genome sequencing with core genome multilocus sequence typing. Vancomycin susceptibility, heteroresistance screening, and tolerance testing were performed on available isolates.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Antimicrobial susceptibility and multidrug resistance rates, vancomycin phenotypic profiles, MRSA genotypic distribution, and final best-corrected visual acuity RESULTS: Median age was 63.5 years, and 61.4% were female. Ocular surface disease (67.7%) and prior ocular surgery (65.2%) were common. Only 25.4% had significant healthcare exposure in the preceding year. Most isolates (85.7%) were MDR. Fluoroquinolone susceptibility was low (moxifloxacin 19.7%). All isolates were susceptible to vancomycin (MIC₉₀ 2 µg/mL), and no…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 67 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free