Evidence Hub

Towards model-informed precision dosing of clofazimine, moxifloxacin, and terizidone/cycloserine in the treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis: An external model evaluation study

Emily Behrens, Niklas Köhler, Max Münchow, N. Zielinski, Christoph Pfaffendorf, H. Grobbel, D. Schaub, Maja Reimann et al.

Tuberculosis, 2026

1 citation

Abstract

Clofazimine, moxifloxacin and terizidone/cycloserine play an important role in the treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB). Personalized therapy guided by model-informed precision dosing (MIPD) can be a powerful tool to improve treatment outcomes, minimize adverse effects and combat the emergence of resistance. To set up an MIPD workflow, a population pharmacokinetic model (popPK model) is required. In this study, an external evaluation of popPK models of the three aforementioned drugs was carried out, using pharmacokinetic data from a cohort of patients with DR-TB, in order to identify the model with the best predictive performance. The best performing models (Abdelwahab et al. for clofazimine, Chirehwa et al. for moxifloxacin and Mulubwa and Mugabo for terizidone/cycloserine) were selected to calculate the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC, total exposure). An interoccasion variability (IOV, variability across dosing occasions) of AUC was quantified (13.4%CV (clofazimine), 16.1%CV (moxifloxacin), 14.5%CV (cycloserine)) indicating that using samples from one dosing occasion for AUC calculations may be sufficient to guide potential dose adjustment. Various single sampling schemes to estimate AUC were evaluated, but a unified timepoint for all drugs could not be determined. Known pharmacodynamic targets (AUC0-24h/MIC, or T>MIC) were attained in almost all patients and dosing occasions.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free