Evidence Hub

Evaluating treatment outcomes stratified by regimen among drug-resistant TB patients in Sierra Leone

J. A. Koroma, B. Fofanah, D. Nair, E. M. Kamau, I. Kamara, M. A. Sesay, I. S. Turay, N. Sesay et al.

Public Health Action, 2026

1 citation

Abstract

SETTING Sierra Leone has a high burden of drug-resistant TB (DR-TB), managed at three treatment centres. OBJECTIVE To compare treatment success between BPaL (bedaquiline, pretomanid, and linezolid)/BPaLM (bedaquiline, pretomanid, linezolid, and moxifloxacin) and the standardised short and the individualised long regimens among DR-TB patients and identify predictors of unsuccessful outcomes. DESIGN Retrospective cohort study utilising routinely collected national DR-TB data from January 2022 to December 2024. RESULTS Among 598 DR-TB patients registered from 2022 to 2024, 571 with complete outcomes were analysed. Overall treatment success was 80.2%, highest with BPaL/BPaLM (87.1%) compared with the standardised short (78.8%) and individualised long regimens (70.4%). Adjusted analyses showed BPaL/BPaLM remained strongly associated with higher success than the individualised long (adjusted risk ratio [aRR] 2.89; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.80–4.64) and standardised short regimens (aRR 1.46; 95% CI 1.04–2.05). HIV co-infection and underweight body mass index independently predicted poor outcomes. Findings were consistent across propensity-weighted and sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION Under routine programmatic conditions in Sierra Leone, BPaL/BPaLM achieved higher treatment success than standardised short or individualised long regimens. However, HIV co-infection and undernutrition predicted poorer outcomes, underscoring the need for integrated nutritional support, expanded…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free