Evidence Hub

Intracameral antibiotic prophylaxis and surgical expertise: key determinants in endophthalmitis after cataract surgery

Vinicius Campos Bergamo, L. Nakayama, N. S. B. de Moraes, Caio Vinicius Saito Regatieri, Ivan Maynart Tavares, Mauro Silveira de Queiroz Campos, A. L. Hofling-Lima, Maurício Maia

International Journal of Retina and Vitreous, 2025

1 citation

Abstract

Postoperative endophthalmitis is a rare but severe complication of cataract surgery. Intracameral moxifloxacin prophylaxis has been widely adopted, but concerns remain regarding bacterial resistance and clinical outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of intracameral moxifloxacin prophylaxis on endophthalmitis incidence, microbiological patterns, antibiotic resistance, and visual outcomes in a university hospital setting, with comparison to a private hospital cohort. This retrospective cohort study analyzed 21,178 cataract surgeries performed at a university hospital (2014–2023). The incidence of endophthalmitis, microbiological profiles, resistance patterns, and visual acuity outcomes (LogMAR) were assessed. Intracameral moxifloxacin prophylaxis was introduced in 2019. A comparative analysis was conducted with 19,360 surgeries from a private hospital. Fisher’s exact test, Mann-Whitney U test, and Joinpoint regression were used for statistical analysis. Endophthalmitis incidence at the university hospital was 0.109% (23/21,178 surgeries), significantly higher than the 0.021% incidence in the private hospital (p = 0.002). Post-prophylaxis, infection rates declined from 0.219% in 2016 to 0.042% in 2023 (p = 0.003). Staphylococcus epidermidis predominated (52.6%), and moxifloxacin resistance remained stable (pre: 45.5%; post: no increase). Intracameral moxifloxacin significantly reduced endophthalmitis incidence without increasing bacterial resistance.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free