Evidence Hub

Sex-Specific Differences in Helicobacter pylori Eradication Outcomes: Treatment Success and Adverse Events in a Single Tertiary Center in South Korea

Yong-Hun Choi, Nayoung Kim, Moon Chul Lee, Seung Taek Lee, June‐young Lim, Jung Hyun Noh, Wootaek Seo, Hee-Eon Lim et al.

The Korean Journal of Helicobacter and Upper Gastrointestinal Research, 2026

Abstract

Objectives Successful eradication of Helicobacter pylori is essential for improving patient outcomes and preventing gastric cancer; however, evidence regarding sex-specific differences in treatment success and adverse event profiles remain limited. This study investigated sex-based differences in eradication efficacy and treatment tolerability. Methods We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent diagnostic testing, received eradication therapy, and completed post-treatment confirmation testing between 2003 and 2024 at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital. First-line therapy consisted of 10-day sequential therapy, while second-line treatment included 14-day bismuth-based quadruple therapy or 14-day moxifloxacin-based triple therapy. Treatment success and adverse events were evaluated by sex and treatment regimen. Results Females had lower eradication rates in the overall cohort. The intention-to-treat analysis showed significantly higher success rates in males compared to females in the total population (71.1% vs. 65.1%, p<0.001) and in sequential therapy (70.5% vs. 62.1%, p<0.001), although this pattern was not replicated in the per-protocol results. Adverse events were reported nearly twice as often in females, regardless of the regimen, which may partly explain the reduced rates of successful eradication and increased discontinuation. Conclusions Sex-based differences influence H. pylori eradication outcomes, with females showing lower treatment success rates…

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free