Evidence Hub

Association between the atherogenic index of plasma and incident hypertension across different blood pressure states: a national cohort study

Degang Mo, Peng Zhang, Miao Zhang, Hong-Yan Dai, Guo-An Wang

Cardiovascular Diabetology, 2025

6,540 participants · 26 citations

Abstract

Hypertension is a major public health concern, making effective preventive strategies essential. The atherogenic index of plasma (AIP), a new lipid metabolic index that is associated with insulin resistance and cardiovascular diseases. However, the association between AIP and the incidence of hypertension remains unexplored. To address this knowledge gap, we designed a large-scale retrospective cohort study to investigate the association between AIP and the occurrence of hypertension across different blood pressure (BP) states, including individuals with normal BP and those with elevated BP. This retrospective cohort study used data from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) involving participants aged 45 and older, assessed in 2011 and followed up in 2020. AIP was calculated using the logarithmic ratio of triglycerides (TG) to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C). Logistic regression models, restricted cubic splines models, and threshold analyses were employed to examine the relationship between AIP and the incidence of hypertension. Receiver Operating Characteristic analysis was utilized to assess the ability of AIP to predict the incidence of hypertension. Subgroup analyses were conducted across various demographic and health-related factors. Sensitivity analyses were employed to address biases arising from self-reported data. Among 6540 participants, 1909 (29.19%) developed hypertension over nine years. The AIP is an independent risk factor…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 6,540 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free