Evidence Hub

Long COVID-19: a Four-Year prospective cohort study of risk factors, recovery, and quality of life

Sanaa M. Kamal, M. Al Qahtani, A. Alaseeri, Mohey El Deen Mohamed Naghib, Adul Majeed Mazroua Al Mazroua, Abdulaziz M. M. Alshamrani, Mohamed Mazroua Al Mazroua, Faisal F. Alharbi

BMC Infectious Diseases, 2025

1,521 participants · 12 citations

Abstract

Long COVID-19 is a growing public health concern, but its long-term burden and predictors remain underexplored, particularly in underrepresented populations. This four-year prospective cohort study was conducted in Saudi Arabia, enrolling adults with confirmed acute COVID-19 from multiple affiliated healthcare centers between March 2020 and March 2024. Of 1,521 screened patients, 816 were enrolled and followed for up to four years (median: 24 months). Per WHO criteria, participants were classified as having long COVID-19 (n = 238) or resolved infection (n = 578). Demographics, comorbidities, vaccination, reinfection, and acute illness severity were recorded. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was assessed using SF-36 and EQ-5D-5 L. Logistic regression identified predictors of long COVID-19, and Cox proportional hazards models evaluated time to recovery. Fatigue (57.1%), post-exertional malaise (45.8%), cough (41.2%), and cognitive dysfunction (30.7%) were the most common persistent symptoms. Female sex (adjusted OR 11.11; 95% CI: 4.48–26.24) and diabetes mellitus (adjusted OR 14.3; 95% CI: 7.0–29.4) independently predicted long COVID-19. Delayed recovery was associated with female sex (aHR 3.36; 95% CI: 1.85–6.10), diabetes (aHR 1.57; 95% CI: 1.00–2.46), reinfection (aHR 1.86; 95% CI: 1.05–3.29), and hospitalization (aHR 1.08; 95% CI: 1.01–1.16). HRQoL scores remained significantly lower at 6 and 12 months. In the long COVID-19 group, 38.7% of patients normally resumed…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 1,521 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free