Evidence Hub

Tuberculosis After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplant: A 15-Year Case Series Highlighting Diagnostic Challenges

Figueroa-Ortiz C, Schoninger S, Chan JL, Bermudez TA, Li Y, Cander S, Mcgonagle B, Bacon CW et al.

Transplantation and cellular therapy, 2026

10 participants

Abstract

Tuberculosis (TB) is an uncommon but potentially fatal complication after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT). Diagnosis is often delayed due to nonspecific clinical presentations, limited sensitivity of screening tests for latent TB infection, and slow turnaround of conventional TB diagnostic methods. The study aim is to describe the clinical and diagnostic characteristics of allogeneic HCT recipients with TB in the era of molecular and sequence based diagnostic methods. We conducted a retrospective review of microbiologically confirmed TB cases among HCT recipients at a tertiary cancer center from 2010 to 2025. We detail clinical, demographic, and diagnostic characteristics including metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) testing of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and blood (Eurofins Viracor, Lenexa, KS) for 2 individuals. Ten patients were diagnosed with active TB at a median of 122 days post-HCT (range: 36 to 2557). The median age was 53 yr, and 6 were male. Except for 1 patient, all patients were foreign-born. Pre-HCT TB screening was performed in 7 patients; however, only 3 had positive (tuberculin skin test, n = 1; interferon-gamma release assay [IGRA], n = 2), and 1 had indeterminate IGRA results. All patients had abnormal CT chest findings compatible with latent TB. Nine of 10 patients presented with either fever or cough, while 1 patient was asymptomatic with incidental radiographic abnormalities. TB was diagnosed by Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB)…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 10 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free