Evidence Hub

Clinical features and treatment outcomes of acute-onset endophthalmitis caused by Staphylococcus lugdunensis: a case series

Chen JA, Zhao MY, Kiryakoza LC, Merikansky S, Rohowetz LJ, Miller D, Flynn HW

Journal of ophthalmic inflammation and infection, 2026

6 participants

Abstract

PURPOSE: To report a series of patients with acute-onset endophthalmitis caused by culture-proven Staphylococcus lugdunensis and to provide an update on the microbiologic susceptibility and clinical outcomes resulting from this organism. OBSERVATIONS: This study included 6 eyes of 6 patients. The etiologies included cataract surgery (4), intravitreal injection (1), and posterior segment surgery (1). All isolates (100%) of S. lugdunensis demonstrated sensitivity to vancomycin with minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) values ranging from ≤ 0.5 to 1 mcg/mL and to moxifloxacin with MIC values ranging from ≤ 0.25 to 1 mcg/mL. One of 6 isolates demonstrated intermediate resistance to gentamicin with a MIC value of 8 mcg/mL. Four of 6 patients underwent pars plana vitrectomy following initial treatment with intravitreal antibiotics, and 1 eye underwent vitrectomy as initial management. Best-corrected visual acuity at last follow-up examination was≥ 20/150 in 5/6 (83.3%) of cases and ≥ 20/40 in 3/6 (50%) of cases. CONCLUSION AND IMPORTANCE: In this study, patients with acute-onset endophthalmitis caused by S. lugdunensis had relatively good outcomes, similar to a previous case series. Vancomycin continues to have consistent coverage against S. lugdunensis and remains an empiric therapeutic option for acute-onset endophthalmitis.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 6 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free