Evidence Hub

Retrospective analysis of indications and outcomes of trabecular micro-bypass stent implantation in Indian eyes

Pandey A, Kumar H, Kathuria A, Patyal S, Singh S, Pandey B

Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2026

46 participants

Abstract

Purpose: To analyze the patient characteristics, initial outcomes, and complications associated with iStent implantation in Indian eyes.

Methods: This retrospective case series comprised subjects who underwent iStent, iStent inject, or iStent inject W implantation as a standalone procedure or combined with phacoemulsification with at least 12 months follow-up. The main outcome measures were change in intraocular pressure (IOP) and number of anti-glaucoma medication (AGM), post op complications, and resurgery rates at the final follow-up.

Results: A total of 56 eyes of 46 patients were included. Twenty-six eyes received iStent, and 30 eyes received either iStent inject or iStent inject W. Mean IOP reduced by 25.5%, and the mean number of AGM decreased by 75.8% at final follow-up ( P < 0.005). The overall success rate was achieved in 51 eyes (85%). When compared to standalone iStent, combined phacoemulsification with iStent delivered greater reduction in AGM ( P = 0.004). Compared to iStent, eyes with iStent inject and inject W had better IOP reduction ( P = 0.03), lesser AGM ( P < 0.005), and a lesser number of surgical failures ( P = 0.045). Three months after iStent inject implantation, trabeculectomy was performed in one eye with secondary glaucoma. Postoperative IOP rise due to steroid response was observed in 20 eyes (35.7%).

Conclusion: iStent implantation in Indian eyes demonstrated promising outcomes in reducing both intraocular pressure and anti-glaucoma medication…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 46 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free