Evidence Hub

Comparison of a Modified Trabeculectomy Technique With Standard Trabeculectomy in Respect to Effectivity and Complication Rates

Doğruya S, Kayıkçıoğlu ÖC, Kayıkçıoğlu ÖR

Journal of ophthalmology, 2026

27 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the results of modified trabeculectomy with a central scleral gutter under the flap and releasable suture with standard trabeculectomy for open angle glaucoma cases.

Design: Retrospective.

Method: This retrospective comparative case series evaluated the outcomes of modified trabeculectomy in 32 eyes and standard trabeculectomy in 44 eyes with primary open-angle glaucoma or pseudoexfoliative glaucoma. Success was defined as achieving an intraocular pressure (IOP) ≤ 21 mmHg with or without the use of IOP-lowering eyedrops and no need for additional glaucoma surgery.

Results: There were 20 men (62.5%) and 12 women (37.5%), with a mean age of 61.9 ± 10.5 years in the modified trabeculectomy group and 27 men (61.4%) and 17 women (38.6%), with a mean age of 62.3 ± 9.8 years in the standard trabeculectomy group. Modified trabeculectomy group had a preoperative IOP of 26.9 ± 8.1 mmHg and a postoperative IOP of 15.3 ± 4.1 mmHg (p p p = 0.03). Anterior chamber shallowing was observed in 2 eyes (6.3%) in the modified trabeculectomy group, whereas the standard trabeculectomy group exhibited a broader complication profile, including anterior chamber shallowing in 4 eyes (9.0%), needling revision in 3 eyes (6.8%), hyphema in 2 eyes (4.5%), and choroidal detachment in 2 eyes (4.5%).

Conclusion: The modified trabeculectomy surgery lowers IOP effectively with a lower incidence of postoperative surgical complications.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 27 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free