Evidence Hub

Concurrent Nocardia, Cryptococcus and Mycobacterium Infections Unmask Anti-GM-CSF Antibody-Associated Immunodeficiency and Pulmonary Alveolar Proteinosis: A Case Report

Menon V

Case reports in infectious diseases, 2026

Abstract

Anti-granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor (anti-GM-CSF) antibodies, classically associated with pulmonary alveolar proteinosis (PAP), are increasingly recognised as a cause of adult-onset immunodeficiency predisposing to opportunistic infections. Coinfections with multiple opportunistic pathogens in this context are uncommon. We describe a rare case of disseminated Nocardia paucivorans, pulmonary Cryptococcus gattii, pulmonary Mycobacterium chelonae, and subsequent PAP in a patient with high-level anti-GM-CSF antibodies. A 64-year-old man presented with subacute bilateral shoulder pain and was diagnosed with acromioclavicular septic arthritis. N. paucivorans was isolated, and subsequent evaluation demonstrated disseminated infection with numerous brain abscesses, left eye endophthalmitis and pulmonary involvement. Interval computed tomography of the chest revealed new right lower lobe consolidation, a biopsy of which identified C. gattii and M. chelonae. Immunological testing confirmed high-level anti-GM-CSF antibodies. The patient received prolonged combination antimicrobial therapy, including meropenem, ceftriaxone, linezolid, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, moxifloxacin, fluconazole, tigecycline and clofazimine, with clinical and radiological improvement of infectious lesions. Despite microbiological clearance, progressive bilateral ground-glass opacities developed on serial chest imaging consistent with PAP, with no pathogens identified on bronchoscopic…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free