Evidence Hub

Efficacy of brolucizumab and ranibizumab in diabetic macular edema and neovascular age-related macular degeneration: insights from a case series

Hossain B, Rahmatullah S, Ahmed T

Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2026

20 participants

Abstract

Background: The effectiveness of various anti-vascular endothelial growth factors in treating patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) and neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) in Bangladesh lacks comprehensive information.

Objective: We evaluated the efficacy of brolucizumab and ranibizumab and assessed the incidence of drug-related adverse events in nAMD and DME patients of Bangladesh.

Methods: In this retrospective case series, 20 patients who had received either intravitreal brolucizumab (n = 10) or ranibizumab (n = 10) were included. Demographic and clinical characteristics, data on best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and optical coherence tomography (OCT) measurements, including macular volume (MV) and central subfield retinal thickness (CSRT), were recorded for each patient at baseline and follow-up visits. In addition, brolucizumab was compared with ranibizumab in terms of above mentioned parameters.

Results: Both brolucizumab and ranibizumab induced changes in patient parameters, including BCVA, OCT measurements, and MV, relative to baseline values. At the 12-week follow-up, neither drug demonstrated statistically significant superiority over the other (P > 0.05 in all cases). However, over the course of treatment, the mean BCVA showed a significant improvement following the initiation of brolucizumab therapy (P = 0.042). In terms of OCT findings, the mean CSRT significantly decreased from 508.5 ± 101.1 µm at baseline to 241 ± 40.4 µm at week 12,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 20 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free