Evidence Hub

Real-world challenges of 4-month rifapentine-moxifloxacin TB regimen: High hyperbilirubinemia in Thailand

Sanchat T, Chuchottaworn C, Sangsayunh P, Pungtaway S, Rattanawai S

Journal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases, 2026

Abstract

Background: The four-month rifapentine-moxifloxacin (HPMZ) regimen is an alternative to the standard six-month tuberculosis treatment. While clinical trials confirm its efficacy, real-world data, especially in Asian populations, are limited. This study evaluates the effectiveness and tolerability of HPMZ in Thailand.

Methods: A prospective study was conducted at the Central Chest Institute of Thailand (September 2023-June 2025) in drug-susceptible TB patients. The HPMZ regimen included daily rifapentine 1200 mg, moxifloxacin 400 mg, isoniazid 300 mg, and weight-based pyrazinamide for eight weeks, followed by rifapentine, moxifloxacin, and isoniazid for nine weeks. Patients were monitored for adverse events (AEs).

Results: Fourteen participants (median age 54 years, weight 55.35 kg) received a mean rifapentine dose of 21.26 mg/kg. Hyperbilirubinemia was the most common AEs, leading to treatment discontinuation in 78.57%. Grade 3 hyperbilirubinemia occurred in 57.14%, with a mean peak bilirubin level of 3.03 mg/dL. Rifapentine overexposure was observed, with five patients showing a mean maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) of 41.89 ± 10.42 μg/mL.

Conclusion: The high incidence of hyperbilirubinemia suggests a fixed 1200 mg rifapentine dose may not be suitable for lower-weight populations. Weight-based rifapentine dosing and standardized ADR management are crucial for broader implementation. Larger studies are needed to refine dosing and evaluate effectiveness and tolerability.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free