Evidence Hub

First reported recovery and genomic characterization of a previously uncharacterized Mycobacterium species from human blood cultures in an immunocompromised patient: A case report

Asai N, Igarashi Y, Miyazaki N, Shiota A, Yamagishi Y, Nakamura A, Osugi A, Matsumoto Y et al.

IDCases, 2026

Abstract

Mycobacteremia is an uncommon opportunistic infection in immunocompromised hosts. We report the recovery of a previously uncharacterized Mycobacterium species from two independent blood culture sets obtained from an immunocompromised patient with persistent fever. She presented with persistent fever, and two independent blood culture sets yielded a Mycobacterium species. No focal source of infection was identified. Initial identification by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry suggested Mycobacterium diernhoferi; however, species-level identification could not be confirmed by molecular methods. Whole-genome sequencing demonstrated that the isolate could not be assigned to any currently recognized Mycobacterium species. Average nucleotide identity analysis showed 90.5% similarity to M. diernhoferi and 84.4% to Mycobacterium frederiksbergense, suggesting a previously uncharacterized species. Combination antimicrobial therapy was followed by resolution of fever and no recurrent positive blood cultures during treatment. Although the patient ultimately died because of progression of the underlying hematological malignancy, the patient showed sustained clinical improvement without recurrent positive blood cultures during therapy. To our knowledge, this is the first reported recovery of this genomically distinct Mycobacterium species from human blood cultures. This case highlights the value of whole-genome sequencing in recognizing previously uncharacterized Mycobacterium species recovered…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free