Evidence Hub

Evaluating the Effectiveness and Safety of a Shortened Rifapentine-Moxifloxacin Regimen in Treating Drug-Sensitive Pulmonary Tuberculosis: A Systematic Review

Luthfia Ayu Wicaksana, Endy Amos Todo Hasudungan Sirait

Medicinus, 2026

Abstract

Background: Prolonged treatment duration remains a key challenge in managing drug-sensitive pulmonary tuberculosis (DS-TB), contributing to poor adherence and treatment failure. Recent evidence suggests that regimens incorporating rifapentine and moxifloxacin (RPT+MOX) may allow for effective 4-month treatment courses. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA 2020 guidelines to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of shortened RPT+MOX regimens. PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus were searched up to May 2025. Eligible studies included randomized trials or observational cohorts comparing shortened RPT+MOX regimens with standard 6-month therapies in patients with DS-TB. Outcomes included culture conversion at 8 weeks, relapse or treatment failure, and serious adverse events. Risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool. Result: Five studies (three RCTs, two observational) met inclusion criteria. Pooled analysis showed no significant difference in risk for relapse or treatment failure (RR 0.79, 95% CI: 0.37–1.67), culture conversion (RR 1.16, 95% CI: 0.80–1.69), or serious adverse events (RR 0.92, 95% CI: 0.65–1.29) between RPT+MOX and standard regimens. Risk of bias ranged from minimal to moderate. The GRADE assessment supported high certainty of evidence. Conclusions: Shortened RPT+MOX regimens demonstrate comparable effectiveness and safety to standard 6-month treatment for DS-TB, supporting their use in appropriate settings. Further studies…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free