Evidence Hub

Effectiveness and Safety of Short-Course Chemotherapy for Drug-Susceptible Pulmonary Tuberculosis: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Valeriya Guseva, Irina A Vasilyeva, V. V. Testov

Tuberculosis and lung diseases, 2025

2 citations

Abstract

The objective: A comparative analysis of effectiveness and safety of treatment for respiratory tuberculosis with confirmed drug susceptibility of M. tuberculosis using short-course regimens and a six-month regimen, based on the published data.Subjects and Methods. A systematic search for randomized and quasi-randomized controlled clinical trials was conducted in databases from January 1, 2010 to January 21, 2025 using the keywords "pulmonary tuberculosis", "drug susceptibility" and "short-course regimens". Eight trials met the selection criteria and were included in the subsequent systematic review and meta-analysis. The primary outcomes focused on the risk of tuberculosis relapse and treatment failure, as well as development of serious adverse events during treatment with short-course regimens. Secondary outcomes included sputum conversion by week 8 of treatment, emergence of acquired drug resistance, and death during treatment with short-course regimens.Results. According to the meta-analysis results, the risk of relapse was three times higher with short-course regimens versus a six-month regimen for drug-susceptible tuberculosis (RR 2.97, 95% CI (2.29-3.85). Short-course regimens slightly increase the risk of treatment failure (RR 1.47, 95% CI (1.27-1.71)) and provide no significant impact on death during treatment (RR 0.57, 95% CI (0.33-0.99)), incidence of serious adverse events (RR 0.90, 95% CI (0.81-1.01)), and sputum conversion by week 8 of treatment (RR 1.12, 95% CI…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free