Evidence Hub

Regional and temporal trends in antimicrobial susceptibility among isolates from bacterial keratitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Stephen J. Tuft, Elliott H Taylor, Keri McLean, Arun James Thirunavukarasu, Rose Herbert, Siyin Liu, Iris Gordon, Neil R. H. Stone et al.

The Lancet Microbe, 2026

1 citation

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Bacterial keratitis is an important cause of preventable vision loss worldwide. In this study, we aimed to synthesise the evidence for regional and temporal differences in antimicrobial resistance that could influence the choice of empirical therapy. METHODS: For this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, clinicaltrials.gov, and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform from their date of database inception to Oct 3, 2025, for studies that reported the in-vitro susceptibility of bacterial isolates from eyes with keratitis, with no restrictions on age, publication date, or language. We excluded animal studies, single case reports, reviews, conference proceedings, editorials, grey literature, unpublished studies, and studies with an incomplete description of the anatomical source of the samples or samples collected from the conjunctiva. We excluded studies that recruited exclusively from settings such as intensive care or only included individuals with specific syndromes or other disease groups. Except for meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, studies that only reported resistant or multiresistant bacterial isolates were excluded. We contacted study authors for further information, as required. We pooled data using a random-effects meta-analysis of proportions and examined susceptibility by Global Burden of Disease super region and changes over time. The main outcome was the…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free