Evidence Hub

Assessing the gender responsiveness of tuberculosis interventions: a scoping review (2000-2025)

Ugwu C, Aneke C, Alex-Uzoatu C, Udu K, Olaolu M, Anyigor C, Ugwu C, Adeyemi O et al.

Systematic reviews, 2026

Abstract

Background: Tuberculosis (TB) continues to impose significant morbidity and mortality, with gender influencing access and outcomes within the TB care continuum. Despite international guidance and global commitments on gender-responsive TB care to improve the equity and effectiveness of the TB response, the extent to which gender is considered in TB strategies remains unclear. This scoping review aimed to collate and synthesize the evidence on gender-responsive TB interventions designed and implemented in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and high TB burden countries from 2000 to 2025.

Methods: The review followed the Joanna Briggs Institute's scoping review guidelines, using the PRISMA-ScR framework for reporting. Studies were eligible if they described TB initiatives for adults aged ≥ 15 years, addressed access to services across the TB care cascade, written in English and explicitly mentioned gender considerations in their introduction, study aims and objectives, or methods sections, beyond sex-disaggregation of results. The search spanned multiple databases and included both peer-reviewed and grey literature. Quality assessment was done using the Crowe Critical Appraisal Tool (CCAT), and gender responsiveness was assessed using the WHO Gender Responsiveness Assessment Tool (GRAT).

Results: Although many TB initiatives reported sex-disaggregated results, most were not gender-responsive by design; thus, from 3878 identified studies, 15 met inclusion criteria. Gender…

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free