Evidence Hub

Comparing Efficacy and Tolerability of Topical Besifloxacin 0.6% vs Moxifloxacin 0.5% Eye Drops in Bacterial Conjunctivitis—A Prospective Study

G Taarika, N Divya, V Panimalar, A Veeramani

CRC Press eBooks, 2025

150 participants

Abstract

Aim: To compare the efficacy and tolerability of topical Besifloxacin vs Moxifloxacin eye drops in bacterial conjunctivitis. Methods: This prospective study aimed to compare the efficacy and tolerability of topical besifloxacin 0.6% versus moxifloxacin 0.5% eye drops in the management of bacterial conjunctivitis. A total of 150 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive either besifloxacin or moxifloxacin eye drops. Results: Clinical resolution rates, time to symptom resolution, recurrence rates, and adverse reactions were assessed. Besifloxacin demonstrated superior efficacy with a higher clinical resolution rate (95.0%) compared to moxifloxacin (88.0%) (p = 0.032) and a shorter mean time to symptom resolution (4.2 vs 4.8 days, p = 0.047). Although the recurrence rate was numerically lower with besifloxacin (6.7% vs 10.7%), the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.211). Conclusion: Tolerability profiles were comparable between the two groups, with besifloxacin showing a trend toward lower incidence and severity of adverse reactions. These findings suggest that besifloxacin may offer superior efficacy and comparable tolerability to moxifloxacin in the treatment of bacterial conjunctivitis.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 150 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free