Evidence Hub

Comparative evaluation of antimicrobial properties of calcium hydroxide-loaded polylactic-co-glycolic acid nanoparticles and calcium hydroxide: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Patil R, Hindlekar A, Jadhav GR, Srinidhi SR, Gaikwad A, Shinde S

Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics, 2025

4 citations

Abstract

Aim: The aim of the study was to evaluate the antimicrobial properties of calcium hydroxide (CH)-loaded polylactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA) nanoparticles (NPs) and CH when used as an intracanal medicament (ICM).

Methods: Adhering guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis, the review was registered in the Prospective Registration of Systematic Review-CRD42023454265. Databases from January 2000 to December 2023 were examined for studies evaluating the various properties of CH-loaded PLGA NPs compared to conventional ICM-CH. Using the Cochrane risk of bias (ROB)-2 tool for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) through its domains using Review Manager (RevMan) software version 5.3, quality assessment was evaluated. Standardized mean difference (SMD) was used as a summary statistic measure with a random effect model (P < 0.05).

Results: To fulfill eligibility criteria, six studies were included in qualitative synthesis, from which three were fit for meta-analysis. The quality assessment revealed a moderate to low ROB. The pooled estimate through SMD (0.45 [-1.17-0.27]) and the favored intervention group (CH-loaded PLGA NPs) showed that the reduction in smear layer/biofilm was more significant in the intervention group. Indicating the absence of publication bias, no presence of any heterogeneity was revealed by the funnel plot.

Conclusion: It was observed that CH-loaded PLGA NPs showed improved antibacterial properties, greater dentinal tubule…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free